1. RoadmasterWB4

    RoadmasterWB4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    636
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Wagon Garage:
    2
    Location:
    Florida
  2. Taranau

    Taranau Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,674
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    99
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    L.A.Calif.USA
    mpg's

    probably the same as a Taurus with a V6, around 18 city 24 highway. Maybe a little less, now that it's tired and worn out. Although, the car in the picture doesn't look very tired and worn out. Looks pretty darn nice, even though it's got no woodie. If I were any where near there and could go for a test drive in it, I would seriously consider getting this one.:yup:
     
  3. RoadmasterWB4

    RoadmasterWB4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    636
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Wagon Garage:
    2
    Location:
    Florida
    I looked it up. Original EPA rating was 19/29.
    The b-body whales with v8's were something like 16/24. My RMW is consistently 17/22 but I kind of drive like a grandpa around town.

    I might try to look at this one. Looks like it might barely be broken in. Could be a good around-town wagon and save the RMW for the long road trips.
     
  4. jmt455

    jmt455 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Messages:
    2,377
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    228
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    FYI; EPA Rating was 17 city/26 highway, 20 combined.
    I think Taranau got it right on the money.
     

Share This Page