1977 AMC Gremlin X

Discussion in 'Car & Truck Talk' started by jwdtenn, Jun 13, 2017.

  1. jwdtenn

    jwdtenn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    1,414
    Trophy Points:
    746
    Location:
    Nashville
  2. KevinVarnes

    KevinVarnes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,211
    Likes Received:
    375
    Trophy Points:
    210
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI
    What is the deal with all of the stupid, poorly framed pictures? I can think of a lot of other way more awesome cars that I would rather buy for $28k.
     
  3. sinc76

    sinc76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Nice Gremlin but that price is over the top. Found an interesting video on the history of the AMC Pacer and AMC in general. Didn't know AMC was originally going to put a GM built rotary engine into the Pacer until the General pulled the plug on them at the last minute:

     
    Poison_Ivy likes this.
  4. cammerjeff

    cammerjeff Longroofs Rule!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Messages:
    5,223
    Likes Received:
    947
    Trophy Points:
    427
    Location:
    Belleville, MI
    Yup, it was also going to be FWD, so imagine the crash reengineering required to go from a light FWD powertrain with a flat floor boards to the I-6 & V-8 engines & RWD. It is why they weigh as much as a Grand Prix or Monte Carlo. No time to properly develop the suspension pieces just over engineer them and hope for the best. It also killed the interior space.

    Back to the Gremlin. yup nice, overpriced and some of the worst (but "artsy" ) photo's I have ever seen in an ad.

    As a reference on the price I paid $3000 less for my 18,000 mile 6.0 V8 Solstice. I bet its more fun than this Gremlin. If it was an early small bumper model maybe????? But it would still be a stretch
     
  5. sinc76

    sinc76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    75
  6. jim535

    jim535 born in a Ford

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2011
    Messages:
    2,898
    Likes Received:
    287
    Trophy Points:
    257
    Wagon Garage:
    2
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Gotta love the '70s plaid interior. But the price is crazy.
     
  7. Poison_Ivy

    Poison_Ivy Dogzilla Fan

    Joined:
    May 20, 2017
    Messages:
    11,094
    Likes Received:
    3,485
    Trophy Points:
    706
    Wagon Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Feeding effigy ice cream to Dogzilla
    GM pulled the plug on themselves, first. They wouldn't produce a Wankel only for a competitor. It was a wise decision, anyway. Even today, Wankels still have sealing- and fuel economy issues.
    The rack and pinion steering was a good idea, though. With that, they could have stuffed a Renault/Peugeot/Volvo V-6 used in the DeLorean with an existing front-drive transaxle, instead of the line 6. The AMC Eagle offered it, as an option:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_Premier
    It still would have been tighter than other models, for servicing. But, not so extreme. French, or better yet Swedish (German?), electronics were already developed. Therefore, more reliable.
    That glass added to weight. Keeping the wagon version while reducing glass space filling it with ordinary sheet metal, they could have curbed the fuel economy issue to acceptable levels.

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page